Manufacturing and industrials
Four ERPs, and no one list of suppliers.
After a few acquisitions, nobody can name your top 20 suppliers by spend without a week of spreadsheets. The same supplier sits under several IDs, parts disagree between PLM and ERP, and every report depends on who built it. We fix the data foundation underneath, starting with the supplier, part and customer masters.
Book a scoping call
01 / Symptoms
What it looks like.
- Spend by supplier that never ties out across entities.
- Duplicate supplier records and duplicate payments.
- Part numbers that differ between engineering and ERP.
- Customer hierarchies that differ by plant or entity.
- An ERP migration planned on data nobody trusts.
02 / Where it breaks
Where it breaks, area by area.
03 / Why now
Why this year.
Dec 31, 2027
SAP ECC mainstream maintenance ends December 31, 2027 (SAP). If master data is fixed before the S/4HANA move, it's fixed once, for both systems.
Source: SAP lifecycle (opens in a new tab)Supplier ownership chains matter for export controls and sanctions screening. That's a supplier master question first.
Procurement and planning AI inherits whatever supplier and part data it's given.
05 / Experience
- Supplier and customer master
- A global customer and supplier master at a large industrial company, integrated with SAP, Salesforce and about 20 ERPs.
- Supplier master program
- Program management of a supplier master program at the same company.
- Product and supplier catalog
- Product and supplier catalogs for a global industrial supplier.
Questions
We're about to migrate ERPs. Should we wait?
No. Clean the masters before the migration, so the new system starts clean and you don't fix the same records twice.
Our ERP vendor says its MDM module covers this.
It may. We diagnose first, and we'll tell you if the module is enough.